OUR HERITAGE AT RISK
NATIONAL TRUST
Making a difference - What happened to placed nominated in 2007?
As part of the Our Heritage At Risk program, the National Trusts have developed a Fate Scale to track what has happened to places nominated as being "at risk".
Heritage@Risk Fate scale
0 Heritage values completely & permanently lost – place destroyed
1 Heritage values mostly/partially lost – place or part of place retained
2 Heritage values still at a high risk of loss or compromise - no clear intent to improve or reduce the risk
3 Heritage values at risk – intent to improve but no action yet taken
4 Heritage values likely to be retained – action taken
5 Heritage values retained – place saved/appropriate conservation work completed
|
REPORT CARD - 2007 NOMINATIONS - AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY |
|
PLACE |
RATING |
OUTCOME |
|
Cameron Offices |
1.0. most heritage values lost |
D ─ Failed T |
|
Canberra Garden City |
2.0 rate of loss still high – no positive action – watching brief |
C ─ Marginal Effort ? |
|
Gold Creek Homestead |
3.5 Intent to carry out solution |
C + Acceptable |
|
Gungaderra Homestead |
2.0 Unchanged – threat remains – still deteriorating through neglect. |
C ─ Poor Effort ? |
|
Hall School |
2.5 No satisfactory resolution – some progress
with planned re-use |
C Marginal Effort |
|
Heritage Places |
3.0 Unchanged – but National Trust acting – possibility of improvement. |
C Marginal Effort |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 